|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
 |
|||||||||
| |
||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
 |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
ASP Free Forums Sponsor:
|
|
|
|
#1
November 23rd, 2004, 06:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Its a doubt
I say stored procedures in SQL server is a concept equivalent to PL/SQL in Oracle. My friend opposes it. Please help me to know which is true.
Thank you.
|
|
#2
November 23rd, 2004, 04:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Listen to your friend, I think. I should mention I've never used Oracle though
__________________
====== Doug G ====== I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it. --Mark Twain
|
|
#3
November 23rd, 2004, 11:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I concur
Both Server systems incorporate Stored Procs, but that's not PL/SQL is.
PL/SQL is actually Oracle's "flavor" of SQL, with proprietary extensions that they implement on their database servers. In MS SQL Server, your equivalent would be T-SQL, which has it's own extensions/changes to the SQL language. (I know, that's redundant, because expanding the acronym means "Structured Query Language Language". Whatever.)
|
|
| Viewing: ASP Free Forums > Database > Microsoft SQL Server > Its a doubt |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
Linear Mode
