
January 18th, 2005, 07:02 AM
|
 |
Web-Standards Evangelist
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,522
  
Time spent in forums: 4 Days 23 h 48 m 4 sec
Reputation Power: 8
|
|
Web Standards Man (myself) reviews and grades sites in 4 categories:
- Code Validation [ 0 = None, 1 = Some attempt, 2 = Transitional, 3 = Strict, 4 = XHTML1.0 Strict / 1.1 ]
- Aesthetics [ 0 = You can guess, 1 = FrontPage Themes, 5 = CSSZenGarden or better ]
- Accessibility [ 0 = Negative usability (eg JavaScript generated menus), 1 = None, 2 = Alt text, etc.../ some attempt, 5 = True content/appearance separation and renders fine in Lynx and Jaws
- Coding Practices [ -1 = Low-End WYSIWYG tools used obstienciously, 0 = No effort whatsoever, 1 = Excessive tables for layout, etc..., 5 = Semantic XHTML w/ CSS ]
Total score is out of 24
so lets see how your site scores up:
----- Hmmm, I've just spotted something in the source:
*cough!*
Code:
<center>
<!-- You may replace the following with your own information -->
<!-- Begin AdDynamix Code -->
<!-- End AdDynamix Code -->
</center>
<div align="center"><!-- You may replace the following with your own information. -->
<!-- Not required, but if you leave the link to FreeSiteTemplates, I'd appreciate it -->
<center>
</div>
</td>
This automatically gives you a score of:
0 for Validating and Coding Practices (it didn't validate either)
Aesthetics are okay... some text hard to read... you're obviously a CS-Kiddie.... Come see me on the Multiplay CS-Source servers, look for "R4xo|2ch3z", we'll see who "pwns" then, shall me?
Accessibility falls flat on its face... no alt text, non <ul>'d navigation, inconsistent UI
Final Score: 2/24
|