|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
 |
|||||||||
| |
||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
 |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
ASP Free Forums Sponsor:
|
|
|
|
#31
September 11th, 2005, 07:59 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#32
September 11th, 2005, 12:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
ok, this was mentioned over in another thread. Would it be possible to change it so that when someone reps someone with no points it does not limit them to rep them again in the near future with points...does that make sense?
|
|
#33
September 11th, 2005, 08:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Troll away 
|
|
#34
September 12th, 2005, 01:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree with Radioactive Frog ... it doesn't make sense that if you rep someone with ')' that you can't rep them sooner with a value. just my opinion.
also, is there a way that the order of the drop down box for number of points be descending. i can't tell you the number of times that i forget to select a value and end up repping someone with 0 points and then have to wait before giving any to them again.
__________________
Come JOIN the party!!! Quote of the Month: Risks: If you never try anything new, you'll miss out on many of life's great disappointments. Questions to Ponder: Is there another word for synonym? iif([sarcasm]=true,iif([you have to ask]=true,"didn't work","ha ha ha"),"not sarcasm") copyright© 2008 sbenj69
|
|
#35
September 12th, 2005, 01:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
That was done intentionally. Reason being, if you mess up and end up agreeing instead of disagreeing or vice-versa, and don't select anything, you only give 0 pts, rather than the max amount...
__________________
Support requests via PM will be ignored!
|
|
#36
September 12th, 2005, 01:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#37
September 12th, 2005, 03:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
We have changed our reputation system, if you leave 0 reputation points to someone it does not limit them to rep again in the near future with points.
|
|
#38
September 12th, 2005, 03:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanx alot thaminda, youre doing an excellent job keeping us all happy
 cheers
__________________
Look! Its a ShemZilla   
|
|
#39
September 12th, 2005, 03:41 PM
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Nice one. Thanks Thaminda & co. This must surely be the ultimately responsive forum.
__________________
And he picked it all up... in his pick-up. Friends of Shemzilla
|
|
#40
September 14th, 2005, 05:32 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
um, not sure it works. or it could just be me..
For example I have repped gunblade twice with no points, he is not on my list of 10 other than that so i have not repped him recently...but i still can't rep him with points.. unless of course the bit which decideds if you are getting rep of not is ignoring the 0's which it should but my list of 10 shows them and gunblade has been repped by me within the 10 but i can't see that...does that make any sense at all??? would it be poss to remove the 0 repps from teh bit in the CP that shows you who you last repped with 0. Then we can see who we are allowed to give repp to....or does noone else think that is a good idea.... just a thought.. RF
|
|
#41
September 14th, 2005, 06:14 AM
|
||||
|
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
